profile-pic
Vetted Talent

Vimal Kant Gairola

Vetted Talent
To gain and implement knowledge about my field, which achieves high career growth through continuous learning process and keep myself dynamic, visionary, and competitive with the changing scenario of the world.
  • Role

    SD WAN Technical Professional

  • Years of Experience

    11 years

Skillsets

  • Microsoft azure (basics)
  • Zxr10 m600-3s
  • Ztezxr10 8900e
  • PTX Series
  • Prisma(cloudgenix)
  • Nexus 7k
  • Nexus 5k
  • Nexus 2k
  • Mx Series
  • Zxr10 5s
  • F5 LTM
  • Ex4200
  • CASA
  • C3750
  • Asr 1k
  • Zscaler
  • Prisma Cloud
  • 7750 sr
  • Juniper srx 210
  • Motorola bsr
  • Cisco cbr8
  • Arris e6000
  • Ex4500
  • T400
  • Redback router
  • 7450ess
  • Juniper srx 110
  • Isr 4k
  • C3745
  • C7606
  • C7300
  • C7200
  • C7609
  • Zxr10 5900e switch
  • HSRP
  • OSPF
  • RIPV2
  • Stacking
  • VSS
  • VPLS
  • E-pipe
  • GLBP
  • VRRP
  • BGP
  • VLANs
  • RSTP
  • STP
  • QOS
  • AWS - 1 Years
  • AWS - 1 Years
  • Python - 2 Years
  • Python - 2 Years
  • EIGRP
  • PPP
  • IS-IS
  • Frame Relay
  • Mpls-vpn
  • Mpls-te
  • GRE
  • DMVPN
  • Multicast
  • Meraki
  • Viptela
  • Nuage
  • VeloCloud
  • Fortinet secure sdwan
  • Cisco asa 5510

Vetted For

16Skills
  • Roles & Skills
  • Results
  • Details
  • icon-skill_image
    Network Architect (Onsite, Ahmedabad)AI Screening
  • 63%
    icon-arrow-down
  • Skills assessed :Agile Methodology, Cloud networking, CCIE, CCNP, CISSP, LAN/WAN, Network Architecture, network implementation, Network Security, QOS, SDN, TCP/IP, VPN, AWS, Azure, Python
  • Score: 57/90

Professional Summary

11Years
  • Nov, 2019 - Present6 yr 6 months

    SD WAN Technical Professional

    British Telecom
  • Nov, 2018 - Nov, 2019 11 months

    Network Specialist

    Aricent Technologies (Holdings) Limited
  • Dec, 2016 - Nov, 20181 yr 10 months

    2nd Level Operations Engineer

    Ericsson India Global Services Private Limited
  • Jul, 2014 - Dec, 20162 yr 5 months

    IP Engineer

    ZTE Telecom India Pvt. Ltd. (on payroll of Teamlease Services Ltd.)

Applications & Tools Known

  • icon-tool

    MATLAB

  • icon-tool

    Putty

  • icon-tool

    Wireshark

  • icon-tool

    BMC Remedy

  • icon-tool

    Prisma Cloud

  • icon-tool

    Zscaler

  • icon-tool

    Python

  • icon-tool

    Microsoft Azure

  • icon-tool

    AWS

Work History

11Years

SD WAN Technical Professional

British Telecom
Nov, 2019 - Present6 yr 6 months
    Working as SD WAN Technical Consultant for multiple enterprise accounts as part of BT Global Services DyNS Center of Excellence/Incubation team. Responsibilities include providing product level assurance & technical management for SDWAN SASE, involved in POC testing for new products. Design, implementing and optimizing SDWAN solutions to enhance network performance, security and scalability for businesses. Collaborating with clients to understand their specific requirements, conducting details assessment and providing strategic recommendations to improve network infrastructure. Key technologies include SDWAN, Viptela, Palo Alto Prisma SDWAN, Zscaler, Velocloud, SASE, Prisma Cloud.

Network Specialist

Aricent Technologies (Holdings) Limited
Nov, 2018 - Nov, 2019 11 months
    Worked as Network Specialist for Coriant 8865 Router Migration for Vodacom, South Africa & Ciena Global TAC. Responsibilities included Coriant Planning & Implementation, MOP Preparation & CR Execution for Coriant 8865 Provider Edge Router Migration, configuration for new TE LSPs, Trunk links, re-routing new LSPs, troubleshooting for MPLS-TE, BGP, OSPF, L2 VPN & L3 VPN, and global support for Ciena Product Family Switches 3K, 5K, 8700.

2nd Level Operations Engineer

Ericsson India Global Services Private Limited
Dec, 2016 - Nov, 20181 yr 10 months
    Worked as MPLS/Data Core Network Operation team member for Virgin Media UK & Ireland. Responsibilities included troubleshooting on Backbone connectivity in ISP, MPLS & DCN, troubleshooting on (Cisco, Juniper, Alcatel) Routers & Switches, configuration of L3VPN in Hub & Spoke with Dual Hub & Mesh topologies, coordination with Cisco TAC for hardware & software failures, implementation of IP change Management requests, and support for change requests for 1,000+ operational Backbone routers in LG IP/MPLS network.

IP Engineer

ZTE Telecom India Pvt. Ltd. (on payroll of Teamlease Services Ltd.)
Jul, 2014 - Dec, 20162 yr 5 months
    Worked as IP ENGINEER on BSNL GU North Circle, Nodal Chandigarh. Responsibilities included configuring ZTE & Cisco DATA products for new sites, MOP Preparation for Activity, Traffic Migration & Version upgrade, troubleshooting MPLS, BGP, VPN based issues, and resolution of Service Affecting Problems of Enterprise Customers to decrease MTTR and maintain SLA.

Achievements

  • Brilliant Performer rated by BT for 2021.
  • Awarded as Star Performer for the month July-Sept 2015 by ZTE Telecom India
  • GATE-2014 Qualified (92.5 percentile). Received scholarship worth Rs. 2,00,000 from Graphic Era University.
  • Brilliant Performer rated by BT for 2021
  • Star Performer for the month July-Sept 2015 by ZTE Telecom India
  • GATE-2014 Qualified (92.5 percentile)
  • Scholarship worth Rs. 2,00,000 from Graphic Era University
  • Brilliant Performer rated by BT for three consecutive years (2021-23)
  • Awarded as a Star Performer for the month July-Sept 2015 by ZTE Telecom India

Major Projects

1Projects

Wireless Sensor Networks

Jan, 1970 - Jan, 1970
    LEACH and MODLEACH protocols for Wireless Sensor Networks.

Education

  • Bachelor of Technology in Electronics & Communication

    Graphic Era University, Dehradun (2014)

Certifications

  • Completed one week training of IP DATA Networks & ZXR10-DATA Products by ZTE University, Shenzhen.

  • Ip data networks & zxr10-data products

  • Alcatel-lucent sr routers (7750,7450), vpn(e-pipe, vpls,vprn) & ies services

  • Jncia x4 (junos, security, cloud, design)

  • Ccnp route (300-101)

  • Ccna (r/s) 200-120

  • Vmware sdwan ready set go program

  • (edu-238) prisma sdwan: design & operation

  • Vmware sd-wan foundations 2022 (5v0-35.19)

  • (edu-238) prisma sdwan: design & operation with lab

  • Palo alto networks micro-credential for prisma sd-wan consultant (pmsc)

  • Cisco certified specialist-enterprise sd-wan implementation (300-415)

  • Palo alto networks systems engineer (pse): foundation

Interests

  • Travelling
  • AI-interview Questions & Answers

    Could you help me understand more about groups? Hello. My name is. I'm working with BT Group for the last almost four and a half years. Part of the Diviners team, which we can call a center of excellence team in VT. So, we are the major key players in, or you would say, a key role we have in BT in terms of the SD WAN product. We basically deal with five products, which are Nokia, Nuance, Cisco Webex, VMware, VeloCloud, Palo Alto, Prisma SD WAN, and Fortinet SD WAN. So, I'm leading three products right now: Palo Alto, VeloCloud, and we're working with Taylor on the third one. So, I'm handling four to five people, and our SME here. So, everything like this: we manage all the SD WAN changes here. We do all the design-related work, the incubation work, pilot sites, DC sites, migrations here. As well as, we do the work for the product line team. We work closely with the product line team and tech engineers to roll out any software, do some testing, new version testing, new feature testing that needs to be done by us. We are not account-specific team. We are a global team. So, we are basically the three-plus level escalations for all the accounts teams in BT who are managing their own customers. Okay? That's what we really do. And, talking about my experience, I have nine years of experience working. I have worked with network operations, network designing, mobile networks as well as internet networks, and enterprise telecom networks. I have a good solid understanding at CCNP and CCIE level, with multi-product level experience working with Palo Alto, Elara, Lucent, as well as Nokia. Okay, so I have a mix of experience. I've worked in a multi-vendor environment and have a good solid understanding of network engineering. Thank you.

    Configure a secure and scalable way to manage distributed firewalls across different network segments, including LAN, WAN, and cloud networks. In that case, a secure and scalable way to manage distributed firewalls across different network segments, including LAN, WAN, and cloud networks, would be to implement a zone-based policy. In this case, if you want to use a firewall and want to secure all zones, you can create a trusted zone, such as LAN, where you have all the users with private IP addresses, such as 10.x.x.x, 172.x.x.x, or 192.168.x.x. The WAN zone can be an untrusted zone, and the cloud network can be a part of a secured WAN. There will be three zones: the trusted LAN zone, the untrusted WAN zone, and the cloud network. You need to have different policies for each zone. The firewall policy should first allow traffic from LAN to WAN and LAN to the cloud network. The WAN zone can access normal internet, apart from any application not hosted on the cloud network. For any traffic coming from the LAN side, you want that traffic to break out to the cloud based on the types of traffic you want to allow. This can be done by selecting a next hop based on the filtering of the source and destination combination. If the destination is not hosted on the cloud network, you can select a different path or send it directly to local breakout or normal internet. If the traffic is hosted on a cloud application, you can use a next hop, such as an IKEv2 tunnel or IPSec tunnel, which you have created with your cloud provider, maybe Prisma or Zscaler. Any other local traffic can be sent by local internet breakout, but for internet-based traffic, it can be sent to the cloud application page via the IPSec tunnel. It will be a zone-based combination here, where you have to configure different policies for each zone to ensure secure and scalable management of distributed firewalls across different network segments.

    the network monitoring strategy that could alert for issues in both LAN and VPN connections. Studying it could alert for issues in both LAN and VPN. Well, in that case, the network monitoring strategy which I'm understanding is a centralized monitoring which you are referring to, that could alert for issues in both LAN and WAN. Okay, based on that, one you can do network monitoring. I think you can use SNMP, you can use netconf. These types of protocols are famous for any type of monitoring, okay, to fetch the information data. For the monitoring purpose, as well, because these protocols basically fetch at a particular rate, at a particular interval, statistics from the devices, okay, so anything which is coming, any type of trap, any type of alarm which is generated on the device itself can be sent to the centralized controller, it can be any SNMP server, which is hosted, and it can show you those, okay. Apart from the network monitoring strategy, it can show you both the LAN interface is down, link degradation, okay, if you have defined certain parameters, IP SLA tracking, these types of things, it can show from the LAN and WAN perspective, depending on the VPN connection, it can show you those IPSec tunnels or GRE tunnels are going up and down, you are seeing some fragmentation issue, we are seeing some key mismatch, those types of things, okay, so that can be done as well, okay, from the VPN connection perspective. And talking about the implementation, you just need to have an SNMP configuration on your device, or you can do the netconfig, like I said, and every device these days supports the netconf, and netconf basically works on your SSH protocol, okay, port number 22, so I don't think that it will be a challenge for that one.

    in a VPN solution that integrates with both IAS and AWS and Azure to provide secure remote access to your organization's resources. Secure VPN access basically allows remote access, which requires an integration like whenever your remote users are trying to access an enterprise application from their BYOD devices, your laptops, or personal mobile devices. So, basically, they can use an application like Cisco AnyConnect, Palo Alto GlobalProtect, or any other application they prefer. From there, they can use internal applications once they have their valid credentials and multi-factor authentication is enabled, and a token will be generated, then they can securely log in. Depending on the VPN solution that integrates with both AWS and Azure, it will directly connect the remote user to the local site VPN concentrator, where we have the breakout for local traffic as well as the internet. To access an internal application, the remote user can use the local range, going through the data center or logging in from the VPN concentrator. If they want to access AWS and Azure-hosted applications, they can be set up to go directly through the VPN concentrator devices, which will have IPSec or GRE tunnels towards the AWS and Azure cloud. Sometimes, a device is installed on the AWS and Azure cloud, which will run an IPSec connection from your end device to the router or router installed on the AWS or Azure. That's what it usually does, and inside that, the VPN solution works.

    Would you validate network resilience and recovery procedure for enterprise scale SD infrastructure? Enterprise-scale SDN structure, we need to validate network resiliency and network resilience. I mean, you should have a fallback. Okay? Just in case, if you see in a normal SDN structure, there are things like IPsec tunnels. You will form a connection to the Zscaler Prisma Cloud for Internet access. Resiliency, if we talk about, let's suppose if we lose both the IPsec tunnels to different cell nodes. Okay? So, that time, you should have a local Internet breakout at least for those applications. So, the critical ones can use the local internet backup. Talking about resiliency, it's basically the one where you can install two routers, which will be hardware-level redundancy. If you can store two links, it will be link-level redundancy. And recovery procedures are basically the ones I would refer to. Like, your two devices should be connected by what you call a lock or shunt link, or sometimes you call it a bypass pair, in different terminologies. Okay? So, that can help you, whenever you lose one of the links, MPLS or Internet, it can use the other link to go to the network. Okay? Recovery procedures are basically here, sometimes for the enterprise grade. The recovery enables you to send recovery procedures. Recovery is what you can say; you need maybe for recovery when you lose one of the devices. You can check from the lock interface, like, whether the link is up if the device is completely down. Okay? Else, you will need remote access for that one. Okay? Maybe console access, then you can check whether the WAN interface is down, why it's not forming the control connection with the controller. That's why it's not visible to you on the control itself. Okay? And, yes, tested resiliency. I've already told you about resiliency, network-level redundancy. Recovery procedure for an emergency is just a minute. I think that's it for this one.

    Okay. Basically, and for the QoS policies, in order to do that one, first, you need to do a classification. Always, you need to first classify your traffic, based on what type of traffic it is. Sometimes it's voice, critical, or video. Sometimes it's just normal Internet traffic, like Netflix, or Google. So first, that should be the classification part you always do. Once the classification is done, then we basically assign them to different queues. Different queues have different types of policies and bandwidth. So you define different bandwidths. First, you do classify and divide traffic. Depending on classifying the traffic, you will send all the traffic to different forwarding classes. And different forwarding classes will have a different policer and scheduler. Just in case if the interface gets congested, there's a percentage of bandwidth link bandwidth percentage assigned to each forwarding class. There's a policer, which can be a hard policer or a soft policer. A hard policer is used when you don't want any traffic to go beyond a certain level. So it will drop all the traffic after that one. If traffic goes way beyond a certain threshold, it will downgrade its class map. It will downgrade its class so that it can be sent by the other class. After that, the classification, the forward is assigned to a forwarding class depending on the level of scheduler for the outgoing queue. The outgoing interface scheduler, based on that one, will determine which traffic needs to be prioritized. Which traffic needs to be noted. Like, it can be weighted as well as non-weighted. In case of congestion, we have congestion avoidance algorithms, like RED, random access, and weighted random access algorithms, which we can use to send this type of traffic first instead of that one.

    Hope so the best script intended to configure be run on the network switch. Okay. For me, darling. Okay. I reported it. Only configure the last view in the expected to add and bring up on Ethernet 0. Okay. I configured add ethernet0:0. Ifconfig ethernet0 LAN up. And then you're gonna configure the last VLAN in the list. Why? Because we are using a for loop, so VLAN should be there. Do config We configure at eth0.0 ifconfig. It's an s VLAN zero. VLAN up. Not getting this one. Maybe it's a loop. That's why it's always getting at 400. It's going only with, sorry.

    The following Python function, which is intended to filter out non whitelisted port from a network configuration distillery. What changes would you make to correct the logic? Okay. Def filter ports, network config. Okay. Filter config blank for service. Put in network config dot item. The support of our report filter config service. So 22/80/21. Okay. Then it will be created as 1, 22, 80, and 21. This will be a new list. And if we do port in network config dot items will be this 1 only. If port in white listed port. Okay. Logic. Felt out no ownership. So that will be year 21. But what we are doing is when we are doing network config key and value combination key value key value, That is fine. Key and value concept. Then filter ports. Filter port is going b network config. Okay. Network config will go to the network config. Okay. Network config will then be updating an empty tuple. Right? It's not a mesh. It's a tuple. Okay. Okay. I think it's a tuple. You won't be able to add any thing to filter config because it's a tuple. No. It's a dictionary blank dictionary. Oh, sorry. It's a blank dictionary. Okay? After that one blank dictionary, what we are doing is port is in the white listed port. Okay? Port matches with the whitelist. Well, then we are filter config service equal to port. I don't think that it will work like this. I think we need to change here from both equal I think it will be filter config. if you're creating it as a dictionary, then sorry for getting the syntax, but I think the folder conf underscore config service equals to port. That needs to be changed.

    Design network data can scale horizontally. Okay, improving a multi-cloud environment in Azure and AWS, network architecture, scale horizontally. So, scale horizontally is the concept, basically, when we increase the number of resources sharing the load. Okay? It's like increasing the number of machines, but not just scaling up the existing ones, you're adding more hosts. Okay? Depending on that, you'll increase the number of processors and CPUs. Okay? That's what you'll scale horizontally.

    Developing a recovery plan to ensure business continuity following a security breach involving LAN and WAN connectivity. You're saying business continuity even in the event of a LAN security breach, is ensuring link or network availability via a redundant path in case of a breach in the network. And breaches can occur due to someone violating security protocols or forgetting to apply access lists on the network, but still, you have a path, so business continuity should be there. So, what business continuity basically does is, you still have the network up and running, but the breach is identified and blocked. You also get a log as soon as someone breaches the system. The network will be blocked for that particular segment. That's why we have the concept of zones in the network, trusted and untrusted zones. If there's a breach, and someone managed to get from the untrusted zone to the trusted zone, they will definitely have access. At that point, we usually block it based on the number of attempts in the network. There should be a limitation on the number of attempts as a security measure. In case of a recovery plan for this, what we basically do is shut down those ports. We need to have a backup plan for this one.